Re: Printed Version of 3.0 Reference
Posted:
Sat Sep 24, 2016 11:57 amby ssylca
Great work! Well done................ congratulations!
S.
Re: Printed Version of 3.0 Reference
Posted:
Sun Sep 25, 2016 5:37 amby ilc
This is a fantastic resource, and I appreciate the time and effort that has gone in to producing it.
If I could make one small suggestion it would be to do away with using a coloured font for the code examples. It can be difficult to read, especially when printed on a monochrome printer. The indenting and different typeface is sufficient (IMHO!
)
Re: Printed Version of 3.0 Reference
Posted:
Sun Sep 25, 2016 5:50 amby Electroguard
I do agree about the the magenta examples Phil, it makes my tired old eyes wince.
I had previously considered suggesting the magenta glare might be changed to something more restful like dark blue or dark green or perhaps even dark red, but I'd probably already said too much, and preferred to avoid sounding ungratefully picky.
Re: Printed Version of 3.0 Reference
Posted:
Mon Sep 26, 2016 11:34 amby PhilTilson
Point taken about the magenta text. I wanted a hgihlight, but I hadn't thought about monochrome printing (or tired old eyes!).
I have changed my version to use blue, which prints very well on a Laserjet and looks more benign on the screen!
The problem I have, however, is that - contrary to the earlier supposition - all the book-marking of page numbers was done manually within a PDF editor. As soon as I reprint the PDF, all the bookmarking disappears, so I have to do it all again!
For this reason I will delay changing the colours until the next 'edition' of the Reference!
Phil