- Sun Aug 09, 2015 2:52 pm
#25473
so my question is... with 1.2.0 they knocked of 8k of RAM usage which was great. With this they say 12K... now is that another 12K off, or is it comparing to earlier, and it is just 4K saved over 1.2.0? Not complaining, not at all. just confused!
- Sun Aug 09, 2015 3:28 pm
#25476
I see no (at least no notable) change from the latest 1.2.0 patches.
- Mon Aug 10, 2015 2:12 am
#25509
It would be nice though if they'd manage to get some of the iram off.
