Current Lua downloadable firmware will be posted here

User avatar
By cwilt
#17114
Ok, like what? What were you missing?

Are some modules required for use with other modules. For example, is SPI required for file.

Yes, definitely. I realized that many users commission several builds in quick succession and then won't have much clue as to what a particular binary contains when they get several success emails in quick succession.
For a moment I thought about letting users give their builds meaningful names but I believe just stating branch and selected modules in the success email is enough. Furthermore, the firmware filename should be something like '<branch>-<number-of-modules>-modules-[integer|float]-<hash>.bin' or so.


I renamed the files to <branch>-<date>-nodemcu-<integer/float>.bin
I would be happy with just an inclusion of the branch and modules selected in the email.
Perhaps attach the files to the email instead of a link.

I requested the same build on all 3 branches and can confirm that all binaries flashed with success. After loading I ran a gpio speed test to confirm it was running normally.
User avatar
By marcelstoer
#17115
Are some modules required for use with other modules. For example, is SPI required for file.


That information isn't available anywhere yet. See https://github.com/nodemcu/nodemcu-firmware/issues/386.

I renamed the files to <branch>-<date>-nodemcu-<integer/float>.bin


Yeah, including a timestamp might make sense.

Perhaps attach the files to the email instead of a link.


That I certainly won't do.

I requested the same build on all 3 branches and can confirm that all binaries flashed with success. After loading I ran a gpio speed test to confirm it was running normally.


Thanks for being so thorough. Good to know it all worked well for you.